Rate of complications and conversions after laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy.

نویسندگان

  • Hajrudin Halilovic
  • Sefik Hasukic
  • Ervin Matovic
  • Goran Imamovic
چکیده

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Although many advantages of laparoscopic method in regard to open one have been already proved, both surgical methods may cause a certain number of complications. The goal of the study is to answer the question: Is Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (LC) safer and more satisfactory method than open cholecystectomy (OC) concerning number, type and seriousness of complications? DESIGN AND SETTING Prospective, the research includes all patients in Bihać Cantonal Hospital during 2007, who had cholecystectomy, laparoscopic or open, because of the gallbladder calculosus. METHODS The study has included 476 patients who had cholecystectomy and who satisfied standards for this study. Of the total number of patients, 293 of them had laparoscopic cholecystectomy and 183 open cholecystectomy. Total number of complications is established for each group of patients. RESULTS The study has shown that there were more complications in patients operated by open method than in those operated by laparoscopic cholecystectomy (p < 0.0001). Intraoperative bleeding was found in 1.63% of patients with open and 0.68% with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Postoperative collection in abdomen were found in 2.18% of patients with open and 1.02% with laparoscopic method. The most common complications for open cholecystectomy were: infection (2.73%), hematoma in the wound (2.73%) and urine retention (2.18%). CONCLUSION It can be concluded that LC and OC are comparable procedures for the treatment of gall stone disease in terms of complications, results of this study demonstrate that LC is essentially a safe procedure with low complicatins, morbidity and mortality rate.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

An investigational study about the conversion risk factors of laparoscopic cholecystectomy to open surgery

Background: Knowing the conversion risk factors of laparoscopic cholecystectomy to open surgery, helps the surgeon to plan for surgery accordingly. This study aimed to determine the risk factors for converting laparoscopic cholecystectomy to open surgery. Methods: In this analytical study, the case information of 1104 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Shahid Beheshti Hospi...

متن کامل

Complications After Laparoscopic and Conventional Cholecystectomy: A Comparative Study

The growing popularity of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has made extensive series comparing laparoscopic and conventional cholecystectomy in a prospective, randomized way nearly impossible. To evaluate LC we compared retrospectively 800 laparoscopic with 748 conventional cholecystectomies (CC). Of the 800 LC, 10 (1.2%) were converted to laparotomy. 6 conversions were related to aberrant ana...

متن کامل

Transient increase in the common bile duct diameter after laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy

Introduction: Increase in the common bile duct diameter after cholecystectomy has been reported in animal model. However, similar studies in the human resulted in controversy. Methods: Between 2008 and 2012, fifty two patients with clinical as well as radiological signs and symptoms of gallbladder disease were enrolled in this study. The patients underwent laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy ...

متن کامل

REDUCED INCIDENCE OF EARLY COMPLICATIONS OF SURGICAL WOUNDS IN LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY

 ABSTRACT Background: The incidence of early wound related complications is assessed in laparoscopic versus open abdominal surgeries. Complications of surgical wounds (esp. wound infections) are considered as a major problem in surgery wards. Complications of surgical wounds are classified as early and late. Common and early complications are hematoma, seroma and wound infection. Methods: The m...

متن کامل

Mortality and complications associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to perform a meta-analysis of large laparoscopic cholecystectomy case-series and compare results concerning complications, particularly bile duct injury, to those reported in open cholecystectomy case-series. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA Since the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the United States, hundreds of reports about the technique have ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Medicinski arhiv

دوره 65 6  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2011